<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\nThe notion of the \u2018paperless office\u2019 sought to persuade us of the green credentials of the digital revolution. That the production and destruction of paper was in abeyance was seen as a good thing \u2013 more ecological, greener. Not only did the volume of paper documents fail to decrease, we now understand that the carbon footprint of the infrastructure required to support the on-line world, with its massive servers and cooling systems, is greater than that of the global aviation industry, not to mention the detritus created by the built-in obsolescence of all those laptops, phones and screens .<\/p>\n\n\n\n
It could be argued that analogue technologies are more focussed at the point of delivery whereas the physical materiality of the digital world is predominantly located in storage, networks and platforms. Much of the physical presence of online presentation is absented from the field of its operation, giving the illusion of immateriality, that is apart from screens, projectors, phones, tablets and cpu\u2019s that carry the images and text.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
That we are able to ignore the material embodiment of image-based technologies on such a vast scale recalls Roland Barthes comment that we are in general unaware of the photograph as physical object, as we are so swept up in the narrative it represents. His declaration in his 1980 work, Camera Lucida <\/em>that; \u2018Whatever it grants to vision and whatever its manner, a photograph is always invisible: it is not what we see<\/em>\u2019, seems not to acknowledge the years of modernism with their emphasis on the object or document as a fact in itself.<\/p>\n\n\n\nAbstract Expressionism, Minimalism and the rest, seem to have done little to reduce our blindness to the presence of the physical embodiment of photographic images.That we are somehow able to live in an \u2018un-physical\u2019 universe in which images and artworks are somehow introduced into our consciousness in a completely immaterial way, is an illusion. If images are apparently created without the substantial use of materials, they are certainly made visible and presented to us through the employment of very substantial technologies. Anxious to embrace the creative possibilities of the digital world and led by the imperative of the new, artists have been keen to engage in these new possibilities, whilst also sometimes being vocal in their critiques of the new environment. This exhibition raises some of these questions \u2013 whilst also celebrating the abstract potential of the analogue world and the many ways in which digital and analogue methodologies interact with each other. Layers, oxidation, accretion, patina and decay are the language of the analogue world. It is the language of geology, of libraries, of the periodic table, chemical variation and carbon dating. The accumulations of time recorded in the material substrates of our surroundings.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n <\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\nThe digital world also has its own aesthetic and powers of enchantment. This aesthetic is often a \u2018given\u2019 \u2013 handed down fully formed by its providers. The \u2018post-photography\u2019 movement is in large part a response to this situation. Artists recognise that the digital world is also heir to obsolescence and decay and has its own language of stylistic choices, accidents and idiosyncracies. David Blackmore\u2019s Liquid Crystal Displays<\/em>, 5\u00d74 transparencies of broken screens electronically re-animated for his large format photographs, point to this aesthetic, whilst reminding us that obsolescence is a continuous process \u2013 and that the future is always out of reach. The digital sublime instructs us in the images of numbers, how they can be assigned to both the minutest and the infinitely large aspects of our world, for example continuing photography\u2019s \u2018special relationship\u2019 with astronomy. Sophy Ricketts Objects in the Field<\/em> (2012) was made during a residency at the Institute of Astronomy at Cambridge University. The images she made there combine some of the last analogue images to be created at the institute with colour pallettes used in more recent false-colour images of deep space, originating from the Hubble Telescope. These deep-space images are gathered as data \u2013 emissions from different types of atoms \u2013 and need to be constructed as images to make them intelligible to the eye. The artist\u2019s strategy references Elizabeth Kessler\u2019s assertion that these colour palettes originate from the tradition of mid 19thC North American painting, for example in the work of Thomas Moran or Albert Bierstadt\u2019s series of mid 19thC paintings of the American West entitled \u201cThe Westward March of Civillisation\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\nApart from its infrastructure and mediums of presentation, electronic images eventually leave no trace \u2013 as long they survive they remain unaltered by the passage of time \u2013 something not lost on those who have made ill-advised contributions to the online world. But eventually they will dissipate in a flash of static, a once vital occupant of an obsolete platform.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Contemporary artists use found images and documents for a number of purposes. Photography is heavily predicated on the passage of time and the use of historical (analogue) imagery is one way of evoking or referring to the past. Some may say that any interest in analogue technologies is a commitment to nostalgia, but there are some effects which are impossible to realise without calling for material assistance and employing the aura which surrounds such artefacts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\nArmenoui Kasparian\u2019s The Survivors<\/em> employs snapshots of refugees from Armenia in 1917 enlarged to full sized figures which powerfully bring our attention to an historical narrative which is still unfolding in the present.<\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\nWhenever a new technique is instigated, existing methods are marginalised, and the resulting benefits derived from these new technologies are transferred to new beneficiaries. The conveniences we enjoy from digital media can mean that we are disadvantaged by the loss of old \u2018goods\u2019. Nihaal Faizal\u2019s Stolen<\/em> is a 16mm film from which the image has been almost entirely stripped from the celluloid. The film, liberated from the Karnataka Documentary Film Archive, is a documentary of Indian independence activist and educator H. Narasimhiah, who appears as a ghost in this document of his own history. The resulting work is emblematic of the vast archives of material history which have failed to make the transition to digital formats.<\/p>\n\n\n\nIt is the prescient task of commercial providers to invent new products which switch the benefits accrued from existing providers to themselves, either inadvertently or deliberately, in the process creating a new range of marginalisations. For artists, all technologies represent potential methodologies whether new or old, and their preoccupations do not necessarily coincide with supposed majority interests in convenience and accesibility. When we reach for our iphones to record the everyday world we may not be overly troubled by the issues that surrounds our easy adaptation to new technologies \u2013 we might think it well worth the trade. But there are pertinent questions raised by the artists in this exhibition about self-expression, ownership and loss, which we might do well to consider.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Allan Parker \u2013 20.02.2017 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Essay for Material Light Kochi Biennale, 2017: In Praise of Shadows Tanizaki\u2019s famous essay, In Praise of Shadows was written in 1936 as a homage to the era immediately preceeding the full-scale introduction of the electric light, a development which was about to change the everyday experience of Tokyo dwellers for ever. This great piece of writing has […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":908,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"ub_ctt_via":""},"featured_image_src":null,"yoast_head":"\n
In Praise of Shadows - Allan Parker<\/title>\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\t \n